The prediction and classification of eye irritation potential of substances can be performed by the assessment of the effect on the EpiOcular™ model.
The human skin model test is validated by the EURL ECVAM (European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing) and is performed in accordance with the OECD guidance OECD 492 at Eurofins BioPharma Product Testing Munich GmbH1 with chemicals, cosmetics or personal care products and pharmaceuticals.
Principle of the Human Eye Model Test
Protocol |
|
Model |
EpiOcular |
Supplier |
MatTek |
Analysis |
Eye irritation potential: cytotoxicity measurement with MTT (mean tissue viability compared to negative control) |
Test chemical concentrations |
Liquids: 50 µL (undiluted) Solids: 50 mg |
Exposure time and incubation periods |
Two different protocols: Liquids: Solids: |
Quality controls |
Positive control: Methyl acetate Negative control: Aqua dest. |
Pre-tests |
To determine if additional controls are needed: NSMTT*: mixing of test item with MTT medium to determine if test item alone can reduce MTT à blue colouring: in main experiment two killed tissues treated with test item and two untreated killed tissues are added as controls NSCliving#: mixing of test item with H2O or isopropanol to determine if strong colour of test item can discolour at contact with this liquids à optical discolouring (measuring of spectrum): in main experiment two living tissues without incubation with MTT medium are added as controls NSCkilled§: if the two other controls were determined à in main experiment two killed tissues without incubation with MTT medium are added as controls |
Application |
Direct topical application of chemicals on eye tissues Two tissue replicates per dose group |
Data delivery |
Optical density (OD) value with microplate spectrophotometer at 570 nm |
Prediction model |
Mean tissue viability (% negative control): ≤ 60%: Irritant (I): No prediction can be made > 60%: Non-Irritant (NI): UN GHS "No Category" |
*NSMTT: non-specific MTT reduction
#NSCliving: non-specific colouring of living tissues
$NSCkilled: non-specific colouring of killed tissues
Eurofins Data for demonstration technical proficiency of the Human Eye Model Test (EpiOcular™)
Chemical |
Physical State |
UN GHS category |
EF category for EpiOcular™ |
In vivo Category 1 |
|||
Methylthioglycolate |
Liquid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
Hydroxyethyl acrylate |
Liquid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5- hexanediol |
Solid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
Sodium oxalate |
Solid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
In vivo Category 2A |
|||
2,4,11,13- Tetraazatetradecane-diimidamide, N,N''- bis(4-chlorophenyl)- 3,12-diimino-, di-D-gluconate |
Liquid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
Sodium benzoate |
Solid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
In vivo Category 2B |
|||
Diethyl toluamide |
Liquid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
2,2-Dimethyl-3- methylenebicyclo [2.2.1] heptane |
Solid |
No prediction can be made |
No prediction can be made |
In vivo No Category |
|||
1-Ethyl-3- methylimidazolium ethylsulphate |
Liquid |
No Category |
No Category |
Dicaprylyl ether |
Liquid |
No Category |
No Category |
Piperonyl butoxide |
Liquid |
No Category |
No Category |
Polyethylene glycol (PEG-40) hydrogenated castor oil |
Viscous |
No Category |
No Category |
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3- (3,4-dichlorophenyl) urea |
Solid |
No Category |
No Category |
2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6- (2H-benzotriazol-2- yl)-4-(1,1,3,3- tetramethylbutyl)- phenol) |
Solid |
No Category |
No Category |
Potassium tetrafluoroborate |
Solid |
No Category |
No Category |
EF = Eurofins Munich GmbH
No prediction can be made: “Category 1 or Category 2”
Table 1: Eurofins data of in vitro eye irritation with EpiOcular™ of fifteen tested proficiency chemicals compared to the data of the OECD guideline 4921.
In Table 1 the obtained data from the in vitro eye irritation with EpiOcular™ of seven non-classified (“No Category”) and eight chemicals without prediction (“No prediction can be made”) are shown. The prediction of all tested chemicals was correct in comparison to the classification of the OECD guideline 492.
The prediction and classification of eye irritation/corrosion potential of substances can be performed by the assessment of the effect on the SkinEthic™ HCE TTT model.
The human skin model test is validated by the EURL ECVAM (European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing) and is performed in accordance with the OECD guidance OECD 492B at Eurofins BioPharma Product Testing Munich GmbH1 with chemicals, cosmetics or personal care products and pharmaceuticals.
Principle of the Human Eye Model Test
Protocol |
||
Model |
SkinEthic™ HCE TTT |
|
Supplier |
EpiSkin |
|
Analysis |
Eye irritation potential: cytotoxicity measurement with MTT (mean tissue viability compared to negative control) |
|
Test chemical concentrations |
Liquids:
Solids: |
|
Exposure time and incubation periods |
Two different protocols: Liquids: 10 min post-soak after application (for all three time periods) Solids: 30 min post-soak after application (for both time periods) |
|
Quality controls |
Positive control: Methyl acetate Negative control: DPBS |
|
Pre-tests |
To determine if additional controls are needed: NSMTT*: mixing of test item with MTT medium to determine if test item alone can reduce MTT à blue colouring: in main experiment two killed tissues treated with test item and two untreated killed tissues are added as controls NSCliving#: mixing of test item with H2O or isopropanol to determine if strong colour of test item can discolour at contact with this liquids à optical discolouring (measuring of spectrum): in main experiment two living tissues without incubation with MTT medium are added as controls NSCkilled§: if the two other controls were determined à in main experiment two killed tissues without incubation with MTT medium are added as controls |
|
Application |
Direct topical application of chemicals on eye tissues Two tissue replicates per dose group |
|
Data delivery |
Optical density (OD) value with microplate spectrophotometer at 570 nm |
|
Prediction model |
Mean tissue viability (% negative control): |
Prediction:
|
≤ 40% after 30 minutes and ≤ 60% after 120 minutes |
UN GHS Category 1 |
|
Any other combination of values |
UN GHS Category 2 |
|
> 40% after 30 minutes and > 60% after 120 minutes |
UN GHS No Category |
*NSMTT: non-specific MTT reduction
#NSCliving: non-specific colouring of living tissues
$NSCkilled: non-specific colouring of killed tissues
Eurofins Data for demonstration technical proficiency of the Human Eye Model Test (SkinEthic™ HCE TTT) for Liquids
Chemical |
Physical State |
UN GHS category |
EF category for |
UN GHS Category 1 |
|||
2-(Diethylamino)-ethanol |
Liquid |
Category 1 |
Category 1 |
Acetic Acid (10%) |
Liquid |
Category 1 |
Category 1 |
UN GHS Category 2 |
|||
2-Butanon |
Liquid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
Acetone |
Liquid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
Hexadecyltrimethyl-ammoniumchloride (2%) |
Liquid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
UN GHS No Category |
|||
1.3-Diisopropyl-benzene |
Liquid |
No Category |
No Category |
Dodecane |
Liquid |
No Category |
No Category |
EF = Eurofins Munich GmbH
Table 1: Eurofins data of in vitro eye irritation/corrosion with SkinEthic™ HCE TTT of seven tested liquid proficiency chemicals compared to the data of the OECD guideline 492B1.
In Table 1 the obtained data from the in vitro eye irritation/corrosion with SkinEthic™ HCE TTT of two non-classified (“No Category”), three irritant (“Category 2”) and two corrosive (“Category 1”) chemicals are shown. The prediction of all tested chemicals was correct in comparison to the classification of the OECD guideline 492B.
Eurofins Data for demonstration technical proficiency of the Human Eye Model Test (SkinEthic™ HCE TTT) for Solids
Chemical |
Physical State |
UN GHS category |
EF category for |
UN GHS Category 1 |
|||
1-Naphthalene acetic acid sodium salt (alpha-) |
Solid |
Category 1 |
Category 1 |
1,2-Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one |
Solid |
Category 1 |
Category 1 |
UN GHS Category 2 |
|||
4-Carboxybenz-aldehyde |
Solid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
2-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone |
Solid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
Ammonium nitrate |
Solid |
Category 2 |
Category 2 |
UN GHS No Category |
|||
Magnesium carbonate hydroxide pentahydrate, light |
Solid |
No Category |
No Category |
Anthracene |
Solid |
No Category |
No Category |
EF = Eurofins Munich GmbH
Table 2: Eurofins data of in vitro eye irritation/corrosion with SkinEthic™ HCE TTT of seven tested solid proficiency chemicals compared to the data of the OECD guideline 492B1.
In Table 2 the obtained data from the in vitro eye irritation/corrosion with SkinEthic™ HCE TTT of two non-classified (“No Category”), three irritant (“Category 2”) and two corrosive (“Category 1”) chemicals are shown. The prediction of all tested chemicals was correct in comparison to the classification of the OECD guideline 492B.